TRO Case
1:2026-cv-02215 Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al
Trademark Infringement
Case No.
1:2026-cv-02215
Filing Date
5/21/2026
Plaintiff
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
Court
District of Colorado
6/4/2026
Emergency MOTION for Leave to Appear Remotely at June 9 Hearing by Plaintiff Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
6/4/2026
MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiff's [25] Ex Parte Application to Appear Remotely at June 4, [sic] 2026 Hearing is GRANTED. Plaintiff's counsel may appear at the June 9, 2026 Hearing via telephone. Counsel shall participate using the following dial-in information: 571-353-2301; Access Code: 783456374. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 06/04/2026. Text Only Entry(nywlc2,)
5/28/2026
ORDER: Plaintiff's Amended Ex Parte Application for: Temporary Restraining Order; Seizure Order; and Order to Show Cause Regarding Why a Preliminary Injunction and Seizure Order Should Not Issue; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof [Doc. [18]] is GRANTED in part as set forth herein. The Parties shall appear before the Court on June 9, 2026 at 12:30 p.m. Mountain Time for a preliminary injunction hearing and hearing pursuant to 15 U.S.C. � 1116(d)(10)(A). This Order is conditioned upon Plaintiff's filing with the Clerk of this Court an undertaking in the form of a bond, certified check, bank check, or cash in the amount of $5,000 no later than 12:00 p.m. Mountain Time on May 29, 2026. No later than June 4, 2026, Plaintiff shall file a declaration detailing all Infringing Merchandise seized at the Morgan Wallen concerts on May 29, 2026 and May 30, 2026 at Empower Field at Mile High. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/28/2026. Text Only Entry(nywlc8,)
5/26/2026
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 5/26/2026. Proposed Scheduling Order due 7/16/2026. Scheduling Conference set for 7/23/2026 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom A402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (ggill,)
5/23/2026
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, Seizure Order and Order to Show Cause Why A Preliminary Injunction and Seizure Order Should Not Issue by Plaintiff Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
5/22/2026
MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiff's [15] Amended Ex Parte Motion to File Excess Pages is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file its proposed Amended Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order; Seizure Order; and Order to Show Cause, [Doc. 15-2], along with the corresponding exhibits, as a separate document. Upon filing the Amended Ex Parte Application, Plaintiff is DIRECTED to submit a Word version of its proposed order to the Court via email at [email protected]. Plaintiff is not required to resubmit any of its other filings by email. In light of the anticipated Amended Ex Parte Application, Plaintiff's [11] Ex Parte Application and [12] Ex Parte Motion to File Excess Pages are DENIED as moot. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/22/2026. Text Only Entry(nywlc8,)
5/22/2026
Amended MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages in Support of Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order, etc. by Plaintiff Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
5/21/2026
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, Seizure Order and Order to Show Cause Why A Preliminary Injunction and Seizure Order Should Not Issue (Ex Parte) by Plaintiff Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
5/21/2026
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the Parties by motion, this Court may direct the Parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at his discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/21/2026. Text Only Entry (nywlc8,)
5/21/2026