TRO Case

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

商标侵权
案件编号
1:2026-cv-06122
立案日期
5/26/2026
原告
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
法院
Illinois Northern District Court
6/2/2026

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The motion for reconsideration [24] is granted. The request for a temporary restraining order, a temporary asset freeze, and expedited discovery is granted. Mailed notice.

6/2/2026

SEALED Order Authorizing Expedited Discovery. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 6/2/2026. Mailed notice.

6/2/2026

SEALED Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 6/2/2026. Mailed notice.

6/1/2026

Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) by Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

6/1/2026

MOTION by Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. for reconsideration regarding order on motion for temporary restraining order, order on motion for miscellaneous relief, text entry, 23

6/1/2026

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, temporary asset restraint, and expedited discovery [12] and motion for electronic service of process [17] are denied without prejudice in light of Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Import & Export Co., Ltd., Case No. 25-2205 (7th Cir. May 29, 2026). Mailed notice.

5/29/2026

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court requires that any motion for a temporary restraining order and/or asset freeze is accompanied by a declaration from an attorney of record that provides the following information. First, to demonstrate the immediate harm necessary to grant the drastic remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant has sold or offered to sell the allegedly infringing product(s) within the last two months and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Generally, evidence that a defendant has sold or offered to sell the infringing products within the last two months may include: (1) screenshots of the listings collected within the last two months; (2) screenshots older than two months with an attestation that the listings reflected in the screenshots have been checked within the last two months and were active; or (3) evidence of a purchase by a customer in Illinois within the last two months. Second, as relevant to personal jurisdiction, without which any temporary restraining order or asset freeze would be invalid, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant sold at least one allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Here, "sold" means that the defendant accepted an order and payment for an allegedly infringing product to be shipped to Illinois. Third, to assure that Court that the rights of defendants who have not yet been served are being appropriately protected, the declaration must identify the case number(s) and assigned judge(s) for any pending case(s) brought by the plaintiff(s) against any of the named defendants, noting whether the intellectual property at issue was the same or different than in this case. If it is the same, the declaration should describe the disposition of the other case. The Court will address any motion for a temporary restraining order only after receipt of the described declaration, which can be filed contemporaneously with the motion. Additionally, to the extent Plaintiff also makes a motion for expedited discovery or for an order permitting electronic service of process, Plaintiff should submit a proposed order for that relief that is separate from the proposed order for the TRO and asset restraint. The proposed order for the TRO and asset restraint should name the relevant defendants directly in the order, without reference to Schedule A. Mailed notice.

5/28/2026

MEMORANDUM by Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order[12]

5/28/2026

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. Exhibit 2 regarding declaration[15]

5/28/2026

MEMORANDUM by Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[17]

5/28/2026

MOTION by Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

5/28/2026

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[18]

5/28/2026

MOTION by Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

5/28/2026

DECLARATION of Dana A. Cizmadia regarding memorandum in support of motion[13]

5/28/2026

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[13]

5/28/2026

MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.

5/26/2026

CIVIL Cover Sheet

5/26/2026

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. Exhibit 2 regarding complaint[1]

5/26/2026

COMPLAINT filed by Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25161487.

5/26/2026

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

5/26/2026

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler

5/26/2026

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

5/26/2026

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio

5/26/2026

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

5/26/2026

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

5/26/2026

MOTION by Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. for leave to file under seal

5/26/2026

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

5/26/2026

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. by Jennifer Van Nacht

5/26/2026

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. by Hannah Alexa Abes