TRO Case
Revelyst Operations, LLC v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
商标侵权
案件编号
1:2026-cv-04804
立案日期
4/28/2026
原告
Revelyst Operations, LLC
法院
Northern District of Illinois
5/7/2026
ORDER Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 5/7/2026. Mailed notice (gel,)
5/7/2026
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Upon review of Plaintiff's corrected amended complaint [16] and declaration of Plaintiff's counsel [19], the Court finds that Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged personal jurisdiction at this early stage of the case and resolved the Court's concerns regarding joinder. The Clerk's office is directed to update the caption to reflect that the only Defendant in this case is "Yiwu Juyi Import And Export Co., Ltd." In any event, Plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery [17] is granted in part and denied in part. The Court grants Plaintiff's request for expedited discovery as the Court finds that expedited discovery is warranted to obtain Defendant's contact information. Enter Order Authorizing Expedited Discovery. If no other relief has been sought, Plaintiff is ordered to file a status report by 5/28/26 updating the Court on the progress of expedited discovery and proposed next steps in the case. Mailed notice (gel,)
5/5/2026
MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery
5/5/2026
Amended Complaint
5/5/2026
DECLARATION of Robert P. McMurray
5/5/2026
DECLARATION of Paul Mills
4/30/2026
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. Upon review of the trademark infringement complaint and other filings, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all 17 defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20. See Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A,No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Indeed, Plaintiff filed a form complaint with generic allegations about coordinated counterfeiting activity between 17 defendants without any details whatsoever, which arguably violates the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 10. The Court also questions whether Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged personal jurisdiction over any defendant. To adequately plead personal jurisdiction, Plaintiff must sufficiently allege that the defendants actually sold the allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois. See Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, 2026 WL 880018, at *1 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026) (citing Curry v. Revolution Lab'ys, LLC, 949 F.3d 385, 400 (7th Cir. 2020)). Plaintiff's amended complaint alleges sales in this district, but those allegations are conclusory and Plaintiff did not provide proof of actual sales in this district, so Plaintiff not sufficiently alleged that the Court has personal jurisdiction over any defendant. See id. (remanding with instructions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction because plaintiff had not provided screenshot evidence of actual sales in Illinois). Accordingly, by 5/8/26, Plaintiff must file (1) Plaintiff must file proof of actual sales in Illinois and (2) either a memorandum explaining why joinder is proper or an amended complaint specifically naming and identifying each defendant being sued and setting forth with more than conclusory statements the alleged infringing activity. Failure to do so will result in the current complaint being dismissed without prejudice and this case being closed. Plaintiff's motion to unseal [12] (which refers to the wrong plaintiff) is granted, and Plaintiff's motion to seal [8] is terminated as moot. The Clerk's office is directed to unseal Dkt. [9]. Mailed notice
4/29/2026
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
4/29/2026
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
4/28/2026
Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Revelyst Operations, LLC
4/28/2026
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by William Benjamin Kalbac
4/28/2026
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Michael A. Hierl
4/28/2026
CIVIL Cover Sheet
4/28/2026
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Revelyst Operations, LLC
4/28/2026
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Robert Payton Mcmurray
4/28/2026
MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
4/28/2026
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
4/28/2026
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Elizabeth Aubree Miller
4/28/2026
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Sealed Schedule A
4/28/2026
COMPLAINT filed by Revelyst Operations, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25038713.
4/28/2026
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
4/28/2026
MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to unseal document Plaintiff's Motion to Unseal Docket No. 9
4/28/2026