TRO Case
Parfum Francis Kurkdjian SAS v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
商标侵权
案件编号
1:2026-cv-04701
立案日期
4/24/2026
原告
PARFUM FRANCIS KURKDJIAN SAS
法院
Northern District of Illinois
5/20/2026
MOTION by Plaintiff Parfum Francis Kurkdjian SASfor extension of the temporary restraining order.
5/12/2026
SEALED ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 5/12/2026. Mailed notice.
5/12/2026
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
4/27/2026
NOTICE of Motion by Paul Joseph Kossof for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief, 12, motion to seal 11, motion for temporary restraining order 13 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 5/12/2026 at 10:00 AM.
4/27/2026
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 7 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 and 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder at least 7 days before the filing of the motion for temporary restraining order. Alternatively, by the same date, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint and amended Schedule A reducing the number of defendants. However, if Plaintiff names multiple defendants, Plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. The Court directs Plaintiff to this Court's standing order in Schedule A cases regarding joinder on the Court's website. Additionally, the Seventh Circuit has recently clarified that establishing personal jurisdiction in Schedule A cases requires that plaintiffs show evidence, for each defendant, of actual sales to Illinois customers and of actual products shipped to Illinois. Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, 2026 WL 880018, at *23 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). Mere evidence of being willing to ship to Illinois customers is insufficient. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint if additional evidence is needed to establish personal jurisdiction over each Defendant under this standard. Mailed notice.
4/27/2026
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.
4/27/2026
MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (Exhibits)
4/27/2026
ENTERED IN ERROR.
4/24/2026
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff PARFUM FRANCIS KURKDJIAN SAS by Paul Joseph Kossof
4/24/2026
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff PARFUM FRANCIS KURKDJIAN SAS Schedule A
4/24/2026
MOTION by Plaintiff PARFUM FRANCIS KURKDJIAN SAS for temporary restraining order
4/24/2026
MOTION by Plaintiff PARFUM FRANCIS KURKDJIAN SASfor electronic service of process.
4/24/2026
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by PARFUM FRANCIS KURKDJIAN SAS
4/24/2026
MOTION by Plaintiff PARFUM FRANCIS KURKDJIAN SAS to seal Schedule A and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert
4/24/2026
DECLARATION of Nicolas Lambert
4/24/2026
CIVIL Cover Sheet
4/24/2026
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff PARFUM FRANCIS KURKDJIAN SAS Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert
4/24/2026
Trademark Report by PARFUM FRANCIS KURKDJIAN SAS
4/24/2026
DECLARATION of Paul Kossof
4/24/2026
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
4/24/2026
NOTICE of Motion by Paul Joseph Kossof for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief, 12, motion to seal 11, motion for temporary restraining order 13 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 4/30/2026 at 10:15 AM.
4/24/2026
Notice of Claim Involving Trademarks by PARFUM FRANCIS KURKDJIAN SAS
4/24/2026
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
4/24/2026