TRO Case
Casetagram Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
商标侵权
案件编号
1:2026-cv-05485
立案日期
5/12/2026
原告
Casetagram Limited
法院
Illinois Northern District Court
6/4/2026
SUMMONS - ERROR UNPROCESSED due to need to use new form for electronic issuance. Please visit our website at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_online/ao440e.pdf?refresh and download the new form.
6/4/2026
SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) by Plaintiff Casetagram Limited
6/4/2026
MOTION by Plaintiff Casetagram Limited for Extension of Temporary Restraining Order
6/4/2026
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion or extension of the Temporary Restraining Order [14] is granted. The current TRO is extended for an additional fourteen (14) days, to and including 6/25/2026. Mailed notice.
6/3/2026
SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) by Plaintiff Casetagram Limited
5/28/2026
SEALED Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 5/28/2026. Mailed notice.
5/28/2026
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Ex parte motion for entry of a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and alternative service [8] is granted. Mailed notice.
5/26/2026
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court requires that any motion for a temporary restraining order and/or asset freeze is accompanied by a declaration from an attorney of record that provides the following information. First, to demonstrate the immediate harm necessary to grant the drastic remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant has sold or offered to sell the allegedly infringing product(s) within the last two months and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Generally, evidence that a defendant has sold or offered to sell the infringing products within the last two months may include: (1) screenshots of the listings collected within the last two months; (2) screenshots older than two months with an attestation that the listings reflected in the screenshots have been checked within the last two months and were active; or (3) evidence of a purchase by a customer in Illinois within the last two months. Second, as relevant to personal jurisdiction, without which any temporary restraining order or asset freeze would be invalid, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant sold at least one allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Here, "sold" means that the defendant accepted an order and payment for an allegedly infringing product to be shipped to Illinois. Third, to assure that Court that the rights of defendants who have not yet been served are being appropriately protected, the declaration must identify the case number(s) and assigned judge(s) for any pending case(s) brought by the plaintiff(s) against any of the named defendants, noting whether the intellectual property at issue was the same or different than in this case. If it is the same, the declaration should describe the disposition of the other case. The Court will address any motion for a temporary restraining order only after receipt of the described declaration, which can be filed contemporaneously with the motion. Additionally, to the extent Plaintiff also makes a motion for expedited discovery or for an order permitting electronic service of process, Plaintiff should submit a proposed order for that relief that is separate from the proposed order for the TRO and asset restraint. The proposed order for the TRO and asset restraint should name the relevant defendants directly in the order, without reference to Schedule A. Mailed notice.
5/22/2026
SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff Casetagram Limited for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Alternative Service
5/13/2026
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.
5/13/2026
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
5/13/2026
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.
5/13/2026
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
5/13/2026
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casetagram Limited by Zareefa Burki Flener
5/12/2026
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casetagram Limited by James Edward Judge
5/12/2026
CIVIL Cover Sheet
5/12/2026
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casetagram Limited Schedule A to Complaint [1]
5/12/2026